RonO (rono_60103) wrote,
RonO
rono_60103

Every so often things make me go "Duh!"

I was just reading some press speculation on today's Apple press conference, and the rumors about it.

One of the rumors was that Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr would appear. Another is the posting of a picture supposedly showing the cover of Sargent Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band on the suspected touch-screen iPod. These led to the speculation that in addition to the new products, Apple might be offering Beatles' music through iTunes.

The article then went on to point out that over the years Apple Corps (a.k.a. Apple Records) has sued Apple Computer over the use of the name "Apple" two or three times, implying that it was this dispute over the similar corporate names that has led to Beatles' music being unavailable through iTuens.

For a year or so I've been somewhat frustrated by the inability to purchase Beatles' albums through iTunes (which is easier than buying and ripping CDs sometimes), and have wondered why they weren't available even though many other Capitol Records releases were. It never occurred to me that it would be because Apple Corps was miffed at Apple Computer for a perceived (and not necessarily nonexistent) infringement of the company name.
Subscribe

  • More From the Department of Homeland Insecurity

    Based on news reports, it is becoming even more clear that The Department of Homeland Insecurity, and its most visible element The Transportation…

  • Pre-Frustrated

    After listening to a CNN report (and waiting 15 or 20 minutes for them to get around to it), it sounds like our travel on Wednesday will be…

  • My Political Rant

    Or a rant in the form, at least initially, of a question: What is the State of California spending its money on? robot_grrl and I just…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment