Log in

No account? Create an account
   Journal    Friends    Archive    Profile    Memories

(Not Quite) current event responses - RonO's Ramblings — LiveJournal

Jun. 28th, 2005 12:33 pm (Not Quite) current event responses

I've been away -- or more correctly way to busy -- for a while. Perhaps, I'll get around to actually letting people know what I've been up to in a bit. But first, some commentary:

Politics follows
Reactions to the Eminent Domain Decision

I, personally, am disappointed in the Supreme Court's recent decision involving Eminent Domain powers(Kelo et. al. v. City of New London et. al.), but it didn't take me by surprise. What has surprised me is the reaction a number of people are having to how the court voted. The breakdown of the vote, at least in general, didn't surprise me one bit.

In fact, I remember telling myself the morning before the decision was handed down, that the decision would be split by one vote -- i.e. a 5-4 decision -- and that most of the conservative members would vote against taking property in these cases, and that most of the liberal members would vote for taking property. However, it seems that a number of other people I've read -- in Live Journal and on rec.arts.sf.fandom -- were shocked that it was the conservatives who were in support of personal property, and the liberals who favored taking property "for the good of the community."

Flag burning Amendment

Once again, the House of Representatives has voted to submit to the several states an amendment to the Constitution that would allow congress to pass laws making it illegal to burn the American Flag.

To me this seems like we are trying to protect a Symbol of the United States, by tramping on one of the things that makes the United States, and its symbols, worth admiring. Further, I'm at least 90% sure that "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech" was intended largely, if not mostly, to protect political speech. Protesting the actions of a government, even by burning a primary symbol for the country led by that government, is clearly political speech.

I've considered writing to my Senators asking them to oppose this amendment, but I'm not sure how useful that would be. From what I've seen, both would already oppose such an amendment either on its own merits (or lack thereof) or simply because it is supported by many conservative Republicans.


1 comment - Leave a commentPrevious Entry Share Next Entry


Date:June 28th, 2005 11:57 am (UTC)
Durbin voted against the flag burning amendment when he was in the house. I've called to ask both to vote against it and suggest you do even if they already plan on voting that way.

I'll agree with you on the Eminent domain issue and would suggest that some of the people who are expressing shock that the conservatives were opposed to it are so because they see it as being not "for the good of the community," but rather for the good of big business, in which case they might assume the conservatives on the court would favor it. I just wish the swing voter on the court had swung the other way on the issue.